Hey,
For transparency: the Massa Foundation is staking 24.2% of the rolls now.
Total: 7% of the active total stake at the time.
They also represent 31% of stakers ⟶ Voters on proposals.
While Massa’s primary focus is decentralization, I don’t think this digit is a good metric for that.
More importantly, there are no statistical models, no on-chain behavioral analysis, and no concrete evidence presented to justify this move. The community was asked to vote on a proposal that seems driven by internal team motivations, not by transparent data or collaborative input.
I agree.
token unlocks will still introduce supply-side pressure
It’s more dangerous than high staking rewards.
The Core Issue: Adoption and Utility
Indeed.