Decentralized search engine for the decentralized web

Ecosystem
1

Rationale

We propose an implementation of a decentralized search engine for the Massa decentralized web.

How would it work

When uploading a website, users can be asked to provide a title, a description, and a limited number of keywords as metadata (see https://forum.massa.community/t/community-feedback-proposal-for-improving-website-storage-on-deweb ).

The search engine would work through a submission process: the creator of a website can call the search engine smart contract to declare their website address. This can also be proposed as a grouped service when uploading a site.

When scanning a site, the search engine does the following:

  • read the title and keywords from the website metadata
  • if the website is already indexed, clear the indexes related to it
  • cleanup keywords:
    • canonicalize (lowercase, trim and other normalizations)
    • remove invisible/control characters, whitespaces etc…
    • remove too short / too long keywords
    • ignore common keywords (eg. “the”)
  • insert each keyword in an index with the following datastore entry: [KEYWORD_TAG][keyword][address] -> (no value)
  • also insert them to a local store: [STORE_TAG][address][keyword] -> (no value) to keep a snapshot in case the keywords change on the original site, and also to be able to update a mutable website in case it is updated by its creator

When a user searches a string, do the following in the front-end of the search engine:

  • tokenize and cleanup the words in the searched string
  • query the blockchain to find all keywords matching those words (note: prefix matching is also counted but with a lower matching score)
  • score, sort and display the results by matching rate
  • when displaying, put the title of the website, its description, any matching MNS, and a link to the website

Anyone can submit a website address to ask for a scan/rescan of a given website but cannot cheat by proposing keywords directly, as they are scanned from the website’s metadata.

4 Likes
2

I agree that we do need a search engine and I would suggest this one to be a collaboration with other crypto projects for added visibility.

I would say that we should also leverage AI as it is the future of search engine.

It will also be difficult to find expert in this domain to make a reliable and performance search engine in my opinion.

For those reasons, I think the search engine should be a collaboration, asking existing proven blockchain search engine to include Massa.

1 Like
3

I love it. Maybe include something more sophisticated than prefix matching, like DTW.

4

To our knowledge, nobody has written a truly decentralized search engine. It’s quite a different beast than traditional ones… But if you have any contacts, feel free to invite them to this discussion

5

Maybe include something more sophisticated than prefix matching, like DTW.

DTW can be implemented for a-posteriori matching score refinement in the front-end. However it is tricky to do in the query phase because the datastore is a binary tree (rocksdb) unless the database saves stuff like all permutations of each keyword. But it would make things quite heavy and complicated.

Any ideas ?