Hey @damir,
I understand the team’s effort and enthusiasm, and I genuinely want Massa to succeed. That is possible — but let’s be honest.
Right now, you seem lost, unsure which direction is truly right for the project (and yes, no one ever knows for sure).
Gather your team and ask a simple but fundamental question:
“What are we willing to work on for the next 10 years, even if there is no funding?”
Then choose that direction. If the answer is the messenger — fine. It will be that you truly care about.
Massa is not a memecoin. It’s not a pump-and-dump. It is a technically strong project that genuinely pushes the industry forward — and that is exactly the problem. Crypto markets don’t reward depth or long-term engineering. Most people won’t pay attention for more than a second.
The market is overcrowded with L1s. Every month, new “Ethereum killers” appear. How will Massa compete with Monad-s, Night-s, and others? You don’t have billions of dollars behind you to brute-force adoption. — The real answer is time.
In 10 years, many of these projects will disappear. Massa can survive and evolve because I know how this space works: many teams build while it’s profitable, then abandon ship. Long-term projects are rare. In crypto, technology is not supported by technology itself — it’s supported by trust and adoption. And trust and adoption take time.
We’ve seen countless “better than BTC” and “better than ETH” projects. Most of them are now irrelevant. True Web3 power is not TPS — Visa/MC does TPS good. I use Bitcoin because I can cross borders with it, and nobody asks me to “prove” it’s good money. Nobody can freeze my account.
Believe in your mission. Create a long-term, forward-looking roadmap — and follow it relentlessly.